Sunday, August 7, 2011

rihanna tattoos 2011

images rihanna tattoos shh. rihanna tattoos 2011. Celebrity Tattoos – Rihanna
  • Celebrity Tattoos – Rihanna



  • iv_only_hope
    07-21 09:20 PM
    Ron gotcher says dates will go back yesteryears:


    "Most likely, India E2 will retrogress in October back to late 2002 or early 2003. Don't count on rapid forward movement in the future."

    He says he got this from DOS.

    What abt this?

    PS: I am just asking not arguing.





    wallpaper Celebrity Tattoos – Rihanna rihanna tattoos 2011. Cute Rihanna Covered in Tattoo
  • Cute Rihanna Covered in Tattoo



  • chanduv23
    06-28 08:57 PM
    There is difference... We didn't spend any money after June VB but everybody spent minimum $500 after July VB...

    If they don't accept application then USCIS made govt = 500* 100,00= $ 5000000.


    Mr Collection agent - why don't we start a new funding drive now :D :D Just kidding - take it easy





    rihanna tattoos 2011. rihanna tattoos,
  • rihanna tattoos,



  • Saralayar
    03-17 10:33 AM
    Asking such things are not correct. Any how labor substitution is not happening much and individuals with real issues like kids going to the final years in school etc., are finaly deciding and trying to take this risk.





    2011 Cute Rihanna Covered in Tattoo rihanna tattoos 2011. Facial Tattoos Inspired by
  • Facial Tattoos Inspired by



  • MYGC2008
    09-17 12:22 PM
    Here is what I want to understand.

    EB2 ROW is CURRENT except INDIA AND CHINA. EB2 ROW will get 28.6% of 140000.
    This means 40040. How they are going to divide these visa between INDIA and CHINA?
    This is NOT SpillOver. I know there is 7% rule, but other countries are always Current.

    And EB1 is CURRENT and considering Bad economy very few cases will be filed under EB1.

    What will happen to those 40040 Visa? If those spillover to EB2 ROW, we may see a large quantity of Visa numbers for EB2.

    Considering 50% of each EB1 and EB2 visas consumed by other than INDIA AND CHINA, still we should get aroud 40040 visas this year.If you furher divide 50% between INDIA and CHINA, both will get 20020, Which might be sufficient to cross 2005.



    more...


    rihanna tattoos 2011. Rihanna#39;s tattoos picture
  • Rihanna#39;s tattoos picture



  • ashutrip
    06-26 02:11 PM
    Hey...No one can predict anything about Aug and Sept. You just have to wait till you get your LC and then check where dates are and file accordingly. There is nothing you can do about it, so relax and don't worry too much.
    If it makes you feel better, then people from 2001/2002/2003 are still still in line. You are lucky at least you have hope that you can file 485 if you get your LC in time.


    it tough to so relax and don't worry too much when I am aware that there are people from 2001/2002/2003 are still still in line doesnot make me happy but I can feel for these blokes.:( :(





    rihanna tattoos 2011. Rihanna#39;s Tattoos – Stars
  • Rihanna#39;s Tattoos – Stars



  • NKR
    02-15 06:34 PM
    probably true but because most of them are on H4 which means someone else in their family is H1.

    what will they do at home anyway?. wouldn't it be better if they be allowed to work than force them to go and study?



    more...


    rihanna tattoos 2011. Rihanna#39;s “Shhh…” tattoo
  • Rihanna#39;s “Shhh…” tattoo



  • senthil1
    03-18 11:15 AM
    You are using labor substitution and also trying to use Part time work done by you in the college. Think yourself it is correct or not. I am sure it is the mistake of company. Many people in the forum are having 10 years of experience but waiting so long. So the the frustration is acceptable.

    Labor substitution is not correct and injustice to those who are waiting for long time even if it is not sold. Legally it may be correct but this practice must be abolished. Only less than 10% of labor substitutions are genueine and others are causing delays to those who are waiting long time.Companies especially consulting companies are using every loophole in the immigration to make money. For example when there is no H1b they are bringing by L1 eventhough that position is not eligible for L1. Actually american system is Law to monitor companies and indivdual are so liberal and expected to follow Ethics. But nowadays in immigration they are trying to find every loophole in the immigration to increase the revenues of Company.


    Mr. Janak,
    Do you understand English? First of all, i had mentioned, i am BEING offered, meaning i havent gone for the labor yet and even if i do there will be no buying or selling involved.
    Second of all, i am sick and tired of stereotype Indians like you, who ASSUME everything without knowing anything and come out with your own theories from the bizzarro world [i know, pathetic loosers like to vent at any and every opportunities they get. Spare me your crap, if u dont know anything and cant help, then just stay quiet.]





    2010 rihanna tattoos, rihanna tattoos 2011. rihanna tattoos shh.
  • rihanna tattoos shh.



  • a1b2c3
    01-14 12:48 PM
    Check what they are paying. I know a company which charges $110-$130 ph to the client and payes around $30K for the employee in L1. Is it good business practice...? Not only desi consulting cos...these a$$ also the reason we are in this mess today. Just imagine when the antis comes to know that 30K pa salary....

    V true.

    Folks, the memo clearly empowers USCIS to crack down on consulting firms which don't have any in-house infrastructure (other than contractors) to execute projects.
    H1B is misused for a long time now by these firms and it was high time they put the screws on these "job shops" as they call it. Unfortunately some talented workers will get impacted.
    But if they are talented they will find opportunities elsewhere. Trust me on that. And better opportunities.

    Nathan is exactly right. These firms have created a mess by bending rules everywhere.

    Don't start speculating that USCIS is trying to throw out all immigrants from this country. I'm surprised that folks don't take a proper view of the situation (yeah..bring the reds on and call me an anti-immigrant).



    more...


    rihanna tattoos 2011. Rihanna Tattoo collection
  • Rihanna Tattoo collection



  • felix31
    10-10 10:21 AM
    i would say ban works for everyone - regardless of the citizenship





    hair Facial Tattoos Inspired by rihanna tattoos 2011. rihanna pisces sign tattoo
  • rihanna pisces sign tattoo



  • JunRN
    09-23 03:26 PM
    Judiciary committee is busy talking about horses...instead of houses....maybe we should say we will buy horses instead if they give greencard...

    just kiddin'



    more...


    rihanna tattoos 2011. Rihanna Quote Side Tattoo
  • Rihanna Quote Side Tattoo



  • at0474
    12-13 01:23 PM
    "Fairness or not is not the issue. Question is can it be challenged in a court? "

    --I guess fairness is the issue and that is what you are asking for by challenging the court.


    "As an unrelated side note, the current quota system is something that has evolved from past policies some of which was used to restrict citizens of certain countries."

    --To some extent,there is truth to what you said. And it is there prerogative. There could be many geopolitical,societal, economic and national security reasons behind who they restrict and who they allow.





    hot Rihanna#39;s tattoos picture rihanna tattoos 2011. Rihanna Tattoos
  • Rihanna Tattoos



  • JA1HIND
    02-13 05:01 PM
    No one would learn to walk if their parents were afraid they would fall.

    The young grad has more fire in him than a seasoned vetran. I think we need more fire in this case than just experience.

    now are going to have a poll on this one too?? LOL!! :D



    more...


    house Rihanna Quote Side Tattoo-New rihanna tattoos 2011. tattoo Rihanna red hair 2011
  • tattoo Rihanna red hair 2011



  • breddy2000
    09-05 03:47 PM
    QUOTE=_TrueFacts;840961]breddy2000,

    Shame on you. thoo

    In your love for YSR, you are behaving like him. Are you from Kadapa? Why unnecessarily picking on CHANDUV23. I got his profile id from Orkut.

    orkut - (http://www.orkut.com/Main#FullProfile?rl=pcb&uid=16002627991370248382)[/QUOTE]

    What are you talking about me ass hole.....I do not have any Orkut and for that matter you cannot see me in Linkedin or any other solcial networking site.....

    Because of assholes like you , who misuse privacy I do not register like you Mr. CHANDUV23.....

    .....Just becasue my handle is contains reddy does not mean I love my Caste. And I have enough guts to say what I want to using my originbal ID and not like u ass hole hinding under the shandow and misuse the system (so called corrupted asshole, who is talking about corruption in India...)

    KLK----

    And guess what's the commonality between "_TrueFacts" and "CHANDUV23"....Both use "IMV" instead of "IV", to abbreviate Immigration Voice....

    Don't let me reveal many more similiarities between "CHANDUV23" and "_TrueFacts".

    Better of begging on the roads rather than playing your split personality role and creating havoc on this public forum.....

    Go see your own posts AH.....

    U Need to alteast learn how to hide your true identity......MOTHER FUCKER...





    tattoo Rihanna#39;s Tattoos – Stars rihanna tattoos 2011. tattoo his right shoulder and
  • tattoo his right shoulder and



  • bayarea07
    09-24 07:27 PM
    Interesting Analysis from Greg Siskind

    http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/

    COULD ELECTION YEAR POLITICS HELP RECAPTURE BILL'S CHANCES?
    Yesterday, I wrote about a great bill that was introduced by Senator Menendez that would recapture hundreds of thousands of unused green card numbers, ease the strict per country limits that cause long lines for nationals of some countries and also make it easier to get a waiver when someone is subject to an unlawful presence bar.It also changes the definition of an "immediate relative" to include spouses and children of permanent residents, a provision which would be wildly popular in the Hispanic community since it would cut out the multiyear waits typical in the Family 2A category.

    And, oh yeah, there's another bill that people are talking about. The E-Verify program (DHS' much discussed electronic employment verification system) expires in November.

    E-Verify is the heart of the entire enforcement agenda for the antis and with Congress set to adjourn in the next week or so and with the distinct possibility that this will put off all legislation until next February or so when the new Congress comes in, getting E-Verify extended in the next few days is a huge deal. A five year extension has passed the House already. The Senate has done nothing yet.

    So it was with great interest that I read in yesterday's CQ Today print edition that Senator Menendez is blocking the E-Verify reauthorization bill in order to force consideration of the recapture bill. The article describes Republicans as being infuriated and saying that the recapture bill is a nonstarter and demanding Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid bring up a clean E-Verify extension bill.

    On the House side, interestingly, the recapture bill was set for a markup in the Judiciary Committee yesterday and Congressman Conyers abruptly adjourned the hearing after a bill barring horse slaughtering was finished yesterday. According to my sources, several members of the Committee were shocked that the markup on the recapture bill didn't happen even though Conyers is a strong backer of the measure. Strange.

    So that has me speculating. Is something cooking with the Democratic leadership and the Obama campaign? I think the Democrats smell blood. They know John McCain is in trouble with Hispanic voters based on recent polling data. He's polling anywhere from 10 to 20 points worse than Bush did in 2004 and the Hispanic vote partially explains why Obama finds himself ahead in places like New Mexico and Colorado, states Bush won in 2004. Erosion of support in the Hispanic community could also cost McCain Florida, a state McCain cannot lose if he has any chance of winning the election.

    As I reported earlier this week, the McCain campaign and congressional leaders have been clamping down on the anti-immigrant wing of the party. You didn't really think these folks suddenly decided they no longer care about this issue, did you?

    What I don't think is a coincidence is the sudden reemergence of immigration in the presidential debate. Suddenly, Obama is blasting McCain on immigration and looking for more and more forums to make his claim that he's pro-immigration and his party's solidly behind him. And he's quick to remind Latinos that John McCain turned his back on them and denounced his own comprehensive immigration reform bill, something that Latino voters are now saying is one their top priorities.

    McCain is asking Latino voters for a do-over and claiming that he was only pandering to his base. He was always pro-immigration. It's just politics, you understand.

    As you might expect, this message is not selling particularly well. And Democrats know it. They also know that with the economy in free fall, most Americans are not thinking that much about immigration anymore and the issue has dropped back to its historically low rank on issues of concern to the typical voter. So Democrats can be more visibly pro-immigration without having to fear negative consequences.

    You probably see where this is going. Provoking a confrontation over immigration with Republicans in the month of October can only have good results. Democrats might actually pass a bill they really want. And they score politically as well.

    There's no time to bring up a massive comprehensive immigration reform bill between now and the election. Something smaller and simpler, but what? Oh wait, there's that recapture bill! And there's that must pass E-Verify bill. Now there's a great way to put immigration back on the front pages. Link the two and force Republicans to vote no on a pro-immigration bill likely to have a hugely positive impact in the Hispanic community if they want the E-Verify program to survive. If the Democrats can keep the two bills linked, Republicans who can't stomach more immigration will have to vote no on E-Verify, something they'll have trouble explaining to their constituents. And Republicans who think E-Verify is too important to die, will help deliver a win on the recapture bill.

    And in the mean time, McCain will have to openly confront the angry antis in his party. Some of the hardliners in his party will call the provisions easing the unlawful presence waivers to be a "back door amnesty." If McCain goes against them, he'll be seen as a liar by the people in his party who he promised that he would not support an "amnesty" without enforcement first. And if he votes with the antis, it will be all the Hispanic community needs to hear to confirm they're right to support Obama.

    October could be interesting.



    more...


    pictures Rihanna#39;s “Shhh…” tattoo rihanna tattoos 2011. Rihanna Launches New Fragrance
  • Rihanna Launches New Fragrance



  • yabadaba
    07-11 09:33 PM
    jazz and others did u give ur ielts..if so where???

    is it reqd ?

    can i submit a 8 yr old copy of my toefl instead?





    dresses Rihanna Tattoos rihanna tattoos 2011. rihanna tattoo pictures along
  • rihanna tattoo pictures along



  • samay
    07-14 06:49 AM
    Thank You Samay !!

    I was in US from 2000 to 2001 on h1b.(first h1 approval)
    Went to india and worked there from 2001 to 2006
    On new H1 came to US on 2006
    I didnt had the H1b approval copy of first h1 approval(2000 -2001) when I applied for 140. I submitted
    only the current one which is from 2006. My 140 is not yet approved.
    So I would like to make sure whether h1b approval notice copy during 2000 to 2001 was needed/
    will be needed in future.I had submitted 140 during July 07.

    Is it needed for any 140 RFE or 485 level ?

    Good Day !
    Rajesh

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by rajeshalex
    Hello,

    Could you tell at 140 level does a candidate needs to submit all the previous
    H1 Approval notices.

    I couldnt submit my previous 140 approval notice since it was during 2000-2001. How important is the previous H1 B approval notices for a 140 approval ? . I submitted the current approval notice which is from 2006-2009

    Rajesh

    Hello

    We normally submit all the previous H-1B approvals with the I-140 application. I am a bit confused from your post is there a gap in your H-1 B approvals.
    __________________

    Was your earlier H-1Bapproval mentioned at all in the I-140. If not I would not worry about it. Relax.



    more...


    makeup Rihanna Tattoo collection rihanna tattoos 2011. Rihanna Quote Side Tattoo-New
  • Rihanna Quote Side Tattoo-New



  • admin
    12-31 07:22 PM
    Very good find logiclife. Hope we can get such good points across to our legislators.





    girlfriend tattoo his right shoulder and rihanna tattoos 2011. rihanna-tattoos
  • rihanna-tattoos



  • webm
    02-12 12:51 PM
    Looks fresh and some positive movement for India EB3 ROW..this time atleast...:)

    Go India EB3 Go...


    Thanks to IV...


    ---------
    PD:Oct'01





    hairstyles Rihanna Quote Side Tattoo rihanna tattoos 2011. 2011 Rihanna#39;s tattoos in
  • 2011 Rihanna#39;s tattoos in



  • a.j.2048
    03-27 12:46 PM
    I wish India allows absentee ballot.

    The way things are right now, as NRIs, we can't even register ourselves in the electoral rolls even if we want to plan a trip to India to conincide with election time.

    You can register to vote as long as you have a permanent address in India, which is pretty much anyone except a US citizen. Voting itself is inconvenient as you have to travel to your constituency for that.





    bayarea07
    07-27 05:51 PM
    Here is the story (in a free book format) of a big Shot (I believe he was emerald ) who went broke while doing amway (MUST READ BEFORE DOING AMWAY)

    http://www.transgallaxys.com/~emerald/files/MerchantsOfDeception.pdf





    sanju
    02-15 11:29 AM
    This country is against slavery of mankind in any form ( atleast that is what they preach to the rest of the world).

    Your above statement is true, but it doesn't apply to EB situation. A slave is not allowed to leave, you are allowed to leave time, at your free will. Its just that you chose not to leave. The correct description of the situation is - you are imposing slavery upon yourself and asking for remedy from the government. Isn't that correct? Jazzy is simply saying that you can leave if you don't like it. So you are not a slave. Its that simple.

    Knowingly or unknowingly they have setup laws which virtually make us slaves.

    Laws are pretty clear, its just that we are stuck in the process created by those laws and we want to call it "slavery".

    This debate will have a conclusive output if we think from our mind instead from our heart. No point in getting emotional about the situation, this debate needs pragmatic thinking and discussion about the possible lawsuit.

    Slavery is not a valid argument so no point in mentioning it. Also, whether of not we have a cause depends on the law and not on the logic or the emotional aspect of the debate.